You bring your own couple and family experiences that may enrich or detract from your success as a..

You bring your own couple and family experiences that may enrich or detract from your success as a couple and family practitioner. Contextualize these issues within your professional practice, and think about how your experience might impact your work with clients. Consider whether there are issues you might find challenging to work with because of your personal history, values, or beliefs, and then reflect on how you might address these challenges.

For this Dis when working with life transition and developmental issues as a couple and family practitioner.

A brief description of the life transition or developmental issue you find most challenging to work with and explain why this issue is challenging for you. Then, explain professional development steps you might take to overcome this challenge.

___________________________________ receptors are located at the ganglia in both sympathetic and…

___________________________________ receptors are located at the ganglia in both sympathetic and parasympathetic divisions of the ANS.

Have a clear thesis and make your arguments very specific in great detail about the preparation you.

Have a clear thesis and make your arguments very specific in great detail about the preparation you underwent during high school that was academic or if there were other lessons that your high school taught/didnt teach that help you in college and life in general.

All of these printed images also make use of words. Would the message of each image be clear without

All of these printed images also make use of words. Would the message of each image be clear without the use of texts? Why or why not?

Write a short 1000 word essay on the following topic: Distinguish science

Write a short 1000 word essay on the following topic:
Distinguish science

 

I need 2 Ap formated Informative essays done.first one is Click here for more on this paper……. Click

I need 2 Ap formated Informative essays done.first one is Click here for more on this paper……. Click here to have a similar A+ quality paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discounted More undocumented children arrive in Arizona in bid to reduce crowding – CNN.com*
and 2nd one is Kerry defends Bergdahl-for-Taliban exchange – CNN.com*
These essays should have
introdoction paragraph-> opening sentence -> information so that reader understands topic.
Body paragraphs -> topic sentece-> supporting evidence that supports thesis-> analysis the significance evidence has -> transition connect each paragraph with a sentence that demostrates how each idea leads to the next and how they support position.
Conclusion: overview of main ideas disscused

Click here for more on this paper……. Click here to have a similar A+ quality paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discounted Click here for more on this paper……. Click here to have a similar A+ quality paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discounted

Political Leadership and the Problem of the Charismatic Power Author(s): Carl J. Friedrich Source:..

Political Leadership and the Problem of the Charismatic Power Author(s): Carl J. Friedrich Source: The Journal of Politics, Vol. 23, No. 1, (Feb. , 1961), pp. 3-24 Published by: Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Southern Political Science Association Stable URL: http://www. jstor. org/stable/2127069 Accessed: 04/08/2008 17:34 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR’s Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www. jstor. org/page/info/about/policies/terms. jsp.

JSTOR’s Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www. jstor. org/action/showPublisher? publisherCode=cup. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission.

JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor. org. http://www. jstor. org POLITICAL LEADERSHIP AND THE PROBLEM OF THE CHARISMATIC POWER* CARLJ. FRIEDRICH Harvard University.

introduced sociology into and its derivatives, THE TERM charisma many years ago by a Germansociologist, has lately been spreading into political science here and abroad. The intellectuals’ desire to sound profound by the use of unfamiliar words may have a share in this fad, but it would seem that the term also responds to a very real need. One recent writer goes so far as to define charisma as “the right to rule by virtue of what they (the leaders) have been and are. ” Needless to say, such vagueness is a far cry from the original usage.

1 In order to be able to assess the utility of the concept of charismatic leadership, charismatic authority (and legitimacy) and charismatic power and rule, it will be necessary to clarify the phenomena of power, rule and leadership which are supposed to be qualified by this quality of being charismatic. Power is a central concern of political science. It is a phenomenon which is universally recognized, but difficult to understand. Like all data of the real world, it defies rigorous definition. Most famous among the attempts at definition is that of Hobbes.

He states that “power is the present means to secure some future apparent good. ” (Leviathan Chap. 10) Such a definition (while historically important as a challenge to the traditional notion that what is “good” can be authoritatively known)2 is both too broad and too narrow. Too broad, because it makes it impossible to distinguish power from wealth; for what is wealth but a present *Based upon a paper delivered at the 1960 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York, on September 9, 1960.

The problems here discussed will be more fully developed within a systematic context in a forthcoming book on this and related issues. ‘Max Weber, Wirtschaft und GeselIschaft, 1922, Part I, Chap. 3, paras. 1014; Part III, Chap. 9, and elsewhere. An abbreviated edition of Talcott Parsons and Henderson was published under the title The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. The discussion of charisma and charismatic leadership is found on pp. 358ff. The statement quoted on charisma is found in M. S. Lipsett, Political Man (1959) p. 49.

2Hobbes, in consequence, denied the notion of a “summum bonum”; these Doints were rightly stressed in comments by David Spitz. [3] 4 THE JOURNAL OF POLITICS [Vol. 23 means to secure some future apparent good? Hobbes’ reply to such an objection would have been, of course, that wealth is a “form” of power; he says as much in the discussion that follows his definition. Whatever may be the argument here on broad philosophical grounds, it is operationally important today to draw this distinction, in order to differentiate political from economic concerns and thus politics from economics.

Actually so broad a definition as Hobbes’ really identifies power with the totality of resources available to a man to realize his values or purposes. If power is thus defined, what does it mean to say that “life is but a ceaseless search for power after power unto death”-the famous claim of Hobbes and recited to this day? It simply says that men seek that which they desire, which is little short of tautological. But Hobbes’ definition is not only too broad; it is also too narrow.

For it talks of power as if it were a thing, something to have and to hold, and may be to sit upon like a bag of gold. Power at times possesses this quality, but at other times not at all, and it is important to see it in its dual nature, because only this Janusfaced quality gives to power the perplexing dynamic quality which men feel but find it difficult to account for. Power is not only a thing, a possession, but it is also a relation, as Locke insists in his Essay on Human Understanding (Bk. II, Chap 21) where he states are “(powers relations, not agents.

” If power is looked at in the dimension of time, it becomes clear that its relational quality is the more evident, the longer the time span involved. For it is in the rise and the decline of political power, whether of individuals or of larger groups that the relational quality, the fact that power is always power over other men, becomes evident. In a certain sense, therefore, it is possible to say that the stress upon its quality as a thing, a possession to have and to hold, is the result of an illusion. But such a statement is not wholly justified.

Due to the institutionalization of power relationships, presently to be discussed, the power attached to a certain office is a thing, a possession to have and to hold. To be sure, the office may be lost as a result of the way the power is used, but while the office is held, the power is in the hands of him who holds it. Therefore it is appropriate to say that power is to some extent 8It is curious and has been noted occasionallythat Locke in his Essays on Civil Government (I1,4) builds the argument upon Hobbes’ concept, though the other notion, implicit in his general philosophy, also plays its part.

1961] POLITICAL LEADERSHIP AND CHARISMATIC POWER 5 a possession p(l), and to some extent a relation p(2). It is the ratio of the two ingredients which political science must continuously be concerned with. The difference between political phenomena in which the ratio of p(l) and p(2) is greater than one, and those in which the ratio of p(l) to p(2) is smaller than one is familiar to the study of politics. The first is typically a stabilized office, such as that of an hereditary monarch, or of an official of a firmly established republic. The second ratio, p (l)

The No Child Left Behind Act, the landmark legislation createdin 2002, continues to make an impact..

The No Child Left Behind Act, the landmark legislation createdin 2002, continues to make an impact on education today. However,there is a push to revise many elements of this act. Search for twoarticles in the Ashford Online Library to read and review onopponents and proponents of NCLB.

In a 2-3 page paper (excluding title and reference pages): QUESTION TITLE :- No Child Left Behind Act paper

What is one issue that eldes to this issue? Use 250 Words.

What is one issue that eldes to this issue?

Use 250 Words.

1. Consider the following current mirror combination, where all transistors have the same…

1. Consider the following current mirror combination, where all transistors have the same kn'(W/L) = kp'(W/L) = 2mA/V2, and VTN-1У, VTP–1V. It is also given that VDD1-10V, VDD2-8V. Remember that for saturation the drain current is given by IDー½ k,”(W/L) (VGS-Yn)” for NMOS and ID ½ kp”(WL) (VGS-V,»)2 for PMOS. You can ignore the channel modulation for all transistors. (a) Find the value of R so that I.-1mA. (b) Are transistors Q1, Q2, Q3 in saturation? (c) What is the range of Vo so that Q4 is in saturation? (d) Assume that a resistor 1K is connected to the output node (at Vo) as the load (i.e. one terminal of the resistor is connected to the output node, and the other to the ground). Will the particular current mirror support this load? (e) Assume that a resistor 1K in series to a constant voltage source Vx are connected to the output node (at Vo) as the load (i.e. one terminal of the resistor is connected to the output node and the other to the voltage course. The other voltage source terminal is connected to the ground). What is the allowable voltage range for V? REF 0 V. 0 1. Consider the following current mirror combination, where all transistors have the same kn'(W/L) = kp'(W/L) = 2mA/V2, and VTN-1У, VTP–1V. It is also given that VDD1-10V, VDD2-8V. Remember that for saturation the drain current is given by IDー½ k,”(W/L) (VGS-Yn)” for NMOS and ID ½ kp”(WL) (VGS-V,»)2 for PMOS. You can ignore the channel modulation for all transistors. (a) Find the value of R so that I.-1mA. (b) Are transistors Q1, Q2, Q3 in saturation? (c) What is the range of Vo so that Q4 is in saturation? (d) Assume that a resistor 1K is connected to the output node (at Vo) as the load (i.e. one terminal of the resistor is connected to the output node, and the other to the ground). Will the particular current mirror support this load? (e) Assume that a resistor 1K in series to a constant voltage source Vx are connected to the output node (at Vo) as the load (i.e. one terminal of the resistor is connected to the output node and the other to the voltage course. The other voltage source terminal is connected to the ground). What is the allowable voltage range for V? REF 0 V. 0