Case Summary Wells Fargo

a brief (1-2 page) summary and analysis of the case using the following format.

• Strategic Profile and Case Analysis Purpose: Identify the key facts of the case and show how they lead to a particular focus for your case analysis. List the key elements of the situation: people, places, activities, and contexts, and discuss the level of uncertainty associated with the information about the case.
• Situation Analysis – External: Review all seven of the general environmental categories (technological, demographic, economic, political/legal, sociocultural, global, and physical environment trends), looking for opportunities and threats that could impact the organization. Use Porter’s Five Forces model to analyze the company’s industry. Identify key competitors and analyze their strategies, core competencies, and competitive response.
• Situation Analysis – Internal: Review factors within the company that are critical to the strategy of the firm and classify them as strengths or weaknesses. Use a value chain analysis to determine which parts of the company’s operations add value, and which do not.
• SWOT Analysis: Compare strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats for the company, and show how they are related. What actions should the company take to maximize the strengths and opportunities, while minimizing the weaknesses and the threats?
• Strategy Formulation: Identify at least three or four business-level or corporate strategies that will help the company to develop a competitive advantage in the future. Explain the advantages and disadvantages of each strategy, select the strategy that you feel is most likely to benefit the company, and explain the reason for your decision using facts from the case, outside research, and theoretical information.
• Strategic Alternative Implementation: Provide a complete and detailed analysis of the steps that must be taken to put the strategy into practice, including structural, leadership, control, incentive, and other changes. Alternatives and recommendations should flow from SWOT analysis and be explained in light of it.

Hello the attach document needs to be fix it  base on the teacher’s comments

1. The thesis in the introduction paragraph must identify 1 specific problem, 2 specific solutions, and 1 specific counterargument. 2. Title page is incomplete – review APA-style tutorial. 3. Autism on capitalize when it begins the sentience. 4. Counterargument not provided. 5. Citation required in each pararagraph. 

 1. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of police activity quotas.  Since police officers usually work without the direct supervision of a sergeant, is it reasonable for police departments to establish expectations of performance?

2. However, activity quotas tend to increase the negative contact between police and the public, particularly with regard to regulatory criminal laws. What alternative policies should police chiefs consider?  Explain your answer.

3. What principle(s) from chapter one might apply? Explain your answer.

Instructions for Assignment

 Principles are 

1) “The enactment of a law requires a commitment to provide the resources and the will to enforce that law.”

 2) “If a law fails to achieve its intended purpose or if there are legitimate reasons why it should not be enforced as written, then it should be revised or repealed.” 

3)  ” In order to gain maximum support and be most reflective of community standards, regulatory criminal laws should be enacted at the lowest level of government that is practical.”

4)  “Part of the legislative process should include input from members of the criminal justice system most affected by that legislation.”

It must be 300 words and more. 

You must use the book that I added in the attachments as a reference. Other outside information is fine as well in addition. 

APA style 

Castillo, V. D. (2019). The Impact of Regulatory Criminal Law on American Criminal Justice: Are There Too Many Laws? (2nd ed.). Carolina Academic Press. https://online.vitalsource.com/books/9781531013431

Thank you!!

On April 28th, 1996, 28-year-old Martin Bryant used a semi-automatic rifle to kill 35 people and injure 23 others in Port Arthur, Australia. The massacre prompted the passage of the National Firearms Agreement (NFA) just twelve days later, which banned semi-automatic and pump-action rifles and shotguns; established a mandatory nationwide gun buyback program; and tightened requirements for licensing, registration, and storage of firearms. Research evaluating the impact of the NFA on firearms suicide, homicide, and mass shootings has been decidedly mixed, with some scholars claiming the legislation significantly reduced gun violence, and others arguing that it had a minimal (if any) effect. Similarly, Americans are divided as to whether Australia’s policy solutions would work in the United States. In a short paper, review the evidence for both sides of the debate, concluding with a discussion as to whether similar policies would be effective in the American context.

 Your response should be 5-7 pages (double-spaced, excluding references) with 1” margins and 12-point Times New Roman font. The file name should be “Last Name, GV Assignment.” Be sure to write your response in your own words—paraphrase instead of directly quoting other sources. Cite all sources in APA format, including in-text and as part of a reference page.

Expectations:

Your paper should be divided into four sections:

1.       Introduction of the NFA debate (0.5-1 page)

2.       Evidence supporting the efficacy of the NFA (2-2.5 pages)

3.       Evidence questioning the efficacy of the NFA (2-2.5 pages)

4.       Conclusion—would this work in the United States? Why or why not? (0.5-1 page)

Do not quote sources word for word (paraphrase instead). Students that directly quote at least once will lose 20 points.

Cite at least 4 peer-reviewed sources (Peer-reviewed means academic journal articles) on the issue (2 supporting and 2 questioning).

You can cite other sources that are not peer-reviewed, but these must be in addition to the 4 peer-reviewed. Examples of non-peer reviewed sources:

Official government reports

Newspaper articles

Survey organizations (e.g., Pew, Gallup, etc.)

Think-tank reports (e.g., RAND, Urban Institute, etc.)

Non-reputable sources should not be included (e.g., Youtube videos, Wikipedia, etc.)

How to Use In-Text Citations

·       Option 1: Use at the end of a complete sentence containing information from the source.

o   Example: There is little evidence to suggest that permissive concealed carry laws impact mass shootings (Fridel, 2022).

·       Option 2: Mention the author(s) by name within the sentence.

o   Example: Fridel and Zimmerman (2019) argue that homicide-suicide has more in common with homicide than with suicide.

·       Keep In Mind

o   If there are three or more authors, use “et al.” or “and colleagues”

o   Do not write the article title, the journal in which it was published, or the full names of the author(s) in your paper. This information is already in the references section.

o   You should use in-text citations when discussing the findings of a study, even if you are not directly quoting it. Any idea that was not originally yours should be cited.

o   You can cite specific statistics from another source in-text without quoting.

§  Example: Fridel (2022) found that a 13% increase in state levels of household gun ownership increases the incidence of mass shootings by over 50%.

On April 28th, 1996, 28-year-old Martin Bryant used a semi-automatic rifle to kill 35 people and injure 23 others in Port Arthur, Australia. The massacre prompted the passage of the National Firearms Agreement (NFA) just twelve days later, which banned semi-automatic and pump-action rifles and shotguns; established a mandatory nationwide gun buyback program; and tightened requirements for licensing, registration, and storage of firearms. Research evaluating the impact of the NFA on firearms suicide, homicide, and mass shootings has been decidedly mixed, with some scholars claiming the legislation significantly reduced gun violence, and others arguing that it had a minimal (if any) effect. Similarly, Americans are divided as to whether Australia’s policy solutions would work in the United States. In a short paper, review the evidence for both sides of the debate, concluding with a discussion as to whether similar policies would be effective in the American context.

Your response should be 5-7 pages (double-spaced, excluding references) with 1” margins and 12-point Times New Roman font. The file name should be “Last Name, GV Assignment.” Be sure to write your response in your own words—paraphrase instead of directly quoting other sources. Cite all sources in APA format, including in-text and as part of a reference page.

Expectations:

Your paper should be divided into four sections:

1.       Introduction of the NFA debate (0.5-1 page)

2.       Evidence supporting the efficacy of the NFA (2-2.5 pages)

3.       Evidence questioning the efficacy of the NFA (2-2.5 pages)

4.       Conclusion—would this work in the United States? Why or why not? (0.5-1 page)

Do not quote sources word for word (paraphrase instead). Students that directly quote at least once will lose 20 points.

Cite at least 4 peer-reviewed sources (Peer-reviewed means academic journal articles) on the issue (2 supporting and 2 questioning).

You can cite other sources that are not peer-reviewed, but these must be in addition to the 4 peer-reviewed. Examples of non-peer reviewed sources:

Official government reports

Newspaper articles

Survey organizations (e.g., Pew, Gallup, etc.)

Think-tank reports (e.g., RAND, Urban Institute, etc.)

Non-reputable sources should not be included (e.g., Youtube videos, Wikipedia, etc.)

How to Use In-Text Citations

·       Option 1: Use at the end of a complete sentence containing information from the source.

o   Example: There is little evidence to suggest that permissive concealed carry laws impact mass shootings (Fridel, 2022).

·       Option 2: Mention the author(s) by name within the sentence.

o   Example: Fridel and Zimmerman (2019) argue that homicide-suicide has more in common with homicide than with suicide.

·       Keep In Mind…

o   If there are three or more authors, use “et al.” or “and colleagues”

o   Do not write the article title, the journal in which it was published, or the full names of the author(s) in your paper. This information is already in the references section.

o   You should use in-text citations when discussing the findings of a study, even if you are not directly quoting it. Any idea that was not originally yours should be cited.

o   You can cite specific statistics from another source in-text without quoting.

§  Example: Fridel (2022) found that a 13% increase in state levels of household gun ownership increases the incidence of mass shootings by over 50%.